Two Types of Guys

Post Reply
outcastsuperstar
Legend Bachelor
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 4:33 pm

Two Types of Guys

Post by outcastsuperstar » Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:37 am

Part 1 tune in at the 2 minute 15 second mark, tuning it at the 6 minute mark and watching first 2 minutes and 10 seconds of part 2 and then fast forward to the 7:22 mark is mandatory listening

table width="690" border="0">

table width="690" border="0">

Before Duncan Idaho deleted his original blog, I saved a comment from the comment section.

This comment was from a woman who made a very big confession.

Here it is:

It is a little strange to be saying this, but you guys are far too nice to the women out there. I was always the "conservative" girl in school. I got married early. Let me tell you, most women out there have had LOTS of sex partners. The idea that there are two kinds of men, those you have sex with and those you marry, is the rule.

Basically, a lot of women like to fall in love over and over. This really means having sex with a new guy every few weeks or every few months. The guys who won't commit are perfect for this. These are the guys they fuck.

The guys they marry are the traditional guys who didn't find a traditional woman earlier on. Women tell all their friends to hush up about their past. They find a decent guy and go after him like it is a religious crusade. Once married, sex stops and paying to keep her happy is the rule.

Lots of women would scratch my eyes out for telling this, but it is the RULE 80% of women go by. There are men you fuck, and men you marry.

I see clearly why good guys are angry. My husband and I are happy together, but it is an extra incentive for my husband to make the marriage work when he sees how horrible things are out in the single world.




In a different blog called the Brazilian Bachelor Stacy Jones; your typical American Woman, made this comment.



Irlandes happened to be reading the Brazilian Bachelor blog at the same time and caught Stacey Jones's comment and here is what he had to say.

Um, Stacy, I suspect that perhaps you miss the point here. The issue is not when is a good age to marry. Thirty might indeed be a good age to marry -- only if you can find some stupid schmuck who will marry you at that age.
The issue is most men don't want to marry a woman of any age who has had tens; hundreds; or thousands of lovers. (I have read a number of times that the AVERAGE in the US is eleven.) Who is marrying only after years of travel and frolicking and sexual promiscuity, to have her own private wage-slave now that Her Royal ******* Majesty has decided it's a good time to marry.

Whose me-me-me attitude is such that the man she marries has a 50% chance of spending many years sending money for kids she hides from him because she finds it convenient to do so, with no regard for their suffering or his.

Your comment is purely selfish. When 'I' want to marry. Why 'I' want to marry at that age. It is clear you have no thought of the potential husband or what he wants, right? After all, he is only a bit player in your personal future. If he agrees to accept that role.

I say, you go get-em, Tiger. You wait until you are 30 to marry. Just don't blame scummy ole' men if you suddenly discover you can't get a good man (i.e. -- Big Bux) to marry you when you are ready as the very large number of women who are discovering they can't find a husband when they are ready.

outcastsuperstar
Legend Bachelor
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 4:33 pm

Two Types of Guys

Post by outcastsuperstar » Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:06 am

When I was in my teens and in my early 20s this pissed me off where I was very angry with Westernized Women. To tell all you Happy Bachelors Members and Guests the truth, I have moved beyond the anger phase and I am now at the point where I am extremely grateful that these Westernized Women are behaving this way.

This is why Mother Nature designed women at an early age late teens-early 20s to have charming sexual powers. During this time young men are nave, dumb and full of cum. I was no exception. This way these women can snatch their long term sucker. Once their sex appeal fades, they will have their sucker stuck in a ball in chain (marriage).

In fact I felt my purpose in life was to be a lifelong wage slave. Then in my mid 20s I wised up and got educated on the Family Court/Divorce Industry.






http://www.outcastsuperstar.blogspot.co ... _4500.html

Thats when I realized I Dodged a Huge Bullet. I could have easily been that sucker who could have gotten married young. Then after 10 years of marriage my then wife could have been banging other dudes, then make a false DV claim to get me booted out of the house which is the opening chess piece move in a divorce proceeding. Basically I would have lost my house (still get to pay for the mortgage payments), pay my and her attorney fees (for a divorce I never initiated), I would only rights to the kids would be a once every weekend visit, on the other days the childrens mother would bad mouth what a terrible father I am to the point that they would not want to see me again. However, I would still have pay for child support payments and the average cost of raising a child is well over $200K. After 10 years of marriage I would have to pay my ex-wife Alimony for life (despite her banging other dudes and being the one initiating the divorce) as well she would entitled to half my retirement benefits.

Now I have successfully graduated from college and I have successfully passed some very tough exams which should give me a good boost to get my career going.

Older and wiser bachelors have kept telling me if you can just make it to 30 unscathed you will be home free. These bachelors went on and lived grand lives once they made out of their 20s.

Now that I got these tough exams passed and I am getting closer to Big 30, I can just taste what this life could be like.

Its shaping up to be where I'm going have a very big successful career.
Im going to get to retire at an early age rather than having to work myself into a grave.
I will be able to save more money for an earlier retirement.
I will be able to afford luxury bachelor vacations or be able to afford high end escorts and enjoy non-committal sex with hot 18-25 year olds when Im 30 years old til the day I die if I wish to do so.
I will be able to indulge in fun hobbies.
When my work is done I get to come out to a nice relaxing peaceful home.

At the same I wont have hear what my short comings in life are.
I wont have to ask for permission how I spend my hard earned money
I wont to worry about anyone else spending my hard earned money as well as running up a big credit card debt and sticking me with the bill.
I wont to worry about a honey to do list.
I wont have to deal with any imaginary crises
I will never have to go through a stressful divorce
I will never to have to experience an aging wife going through menopause

The list goes on and on.

By these women having two types of guys and having me as the guy that they are saving for later. It gave me enough time to wise up to their behavior and learn about the divorce industry.

By the time these women target me in their late 20s-early 40s, it will be too late. As I can now see that I really could have a kick ass bachelor life style once I can cross the big 30 finish line as long as I dont get tied down to the women who plan on saving me for later.

In essence I would have been a lifelong wage slave had these women put the hooks in at an early age but by going out and having their fun, it allowed to me more time to figure this out before it was too late. For this I will always be grateful.

To close here is a famous rant by the Brazilian Bachelor

That's what impress me. If they want "leeyberation", fine. What I find amusing is that they want to convince us to find that attractive (ouch).

They do what they want, no big deal. But then I, along with every male on earth, have every right to do whatever we want too. So, we do not want fat old ladies. We want new and fresh. AND we don't want to marry -- as one wise man said, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free. I can't see ONE SINGLE BENEFIT for a men to marry these days. I am still waiting for the email I asked in another post about this.

They want casual irresponsible sex in their 20s and a wallet in their 30s. I don't give a flying fuck. What I know is that I DO NOT want that this way -- if a girl spends her youth chasing dick, I am out. And fuck off anyone who tries to shame me about this.

Everything has consequences. These cunts can't realize this.

In the end, the "machism" they talk about was for their own benefit. They got a stable home with a provider, a man to take care of her. But no, that was not enough. They got a tiny minority of men who are abusive and tried to put them as a portrait of the male "race". "We want to be free from these monsters!" -- fine for me. Go away.

They can fight everything -- intelectually -- but nature wins everything. And in this game, in the long run, we are the winners. Sorry ladies, that is a fact. If you can't secure a man while you can (read when you're young), you're dead meat, used and discard as WE please. That's the harsh truth. You have no power when you get old and you know this. Women, don't even try to say you changed or some shit like this -- you did not. You just realized that you are now on the loss and changed your game accordingly.

They wanted to be "free" and go kick in a dick in their youth -- and said we didn't let them. In fact we did. What bugs women is that when they do this we don't want them. Well, tough shit. Women don't want poor men too, we get over it just like you have to get over the fact that when you're old and with high dick mileage we want you as far from us as possible.

The "patriarchy" so evil and stuff was for your own benefit, bitches. We get better when we get old. Women do not. We were losing more than you were, but we still did it -- for kids, society, whatever. But you were so ungrateful that you managed to mess what was clearly to your advantage. And now something that was supposed to benefit women is clearly benefitting men. We get old and have more options, not less. We're going to get older, richer and more able to get as much women as we please, and not marry -- just because we can. That's feminism at work for the wise man.

That's not what they planned. Oh well... it doesn't help to say "We are sorry!" now. It was all fun, wasn't it? So much "empowerment"? So much "freedom"?

Reap what you have sown, bitches!

And men are not bitter!
...you are just mad that we know the rules of the game, cunt!

sjenner
In a class of his own
Posts: 7290
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 12:55 am

Two Types of Guys

Post by sjenner » Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:28 pm

I went from being a nice guy mangina years ago to being the jerk bad boy. Now, I have banged dozens of sluts and now don't care. Fortunately, my net worth and sanity have skyrocketed. Just say no to being a fool.

alabama777

Two Types of Guys

Post by alabama777 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:55 pm

[quote]Part 1 tune in at the 2 minute 15 second mark, tuning it at the 6 minute mark and watching first 2 minutes and 10 seconds of part 2 and then fast forward to the 7:22 mark is mandatory listening





Before Duncan Idaho deleted his original blog, I saved a comment from the comment section.

This comment was from a woman who made a very big confession.

Here it is:

It is a little strange to be saying this, but you guys are far too nice to the women out there. I was always the "conservative" girl in school. I got married early. Let me tell you, most women out there have had LOTS of sex partners. The idea that there are two kinds of men, those you have sex with and those you marry, is the rule.

Basically, a lot of women like to fall in love over and over. This really means having sex with a new guy every few weeks or every few months. The guys who won't commit are perfect for this. These are the guys they fuck.

The guys they marry are the traditional guys who didn't find a traditional woman earlier on. Women tell all their friends to hush up about their past. They find a decent guy and go after him like it is a religious crusade. Once married, sex stops and paying to keep her happy is the rule.

Lots of women would scratch my eyes out for telling this, but it is the RULE 80% of women go by. There are men you fuck, and men you marry.

I see clearly why good guys are angry. My husband and I are happy together, but it is an extra incentive for my husband to make the marriage work when he sees how horrible things are out in the single world.




In a different blog called the Brazilian Bachelor Stacy Jones; your typical American Woman, made this comment.



Irlandes happened to be reading the Brazilian Bachelor blog at the same time and caught Stacey Jones's comment and here is what he had to say.

Um, Stacy, I suspect that perhaps you miss the point here. The issue is not when is a good age to marry. Thirty might indeed be a good age to marry -- only if you can find some stupid schmuck who will marry you at that age.
The issue is most men don't want to marry a woman of any age who has had tens; hundreds; or thousands of lovers. (I have read a number of times that the AVERAGE in the US is eleven.) Who is marrying only after years of travel and frolicking and sexual promiscuity, to have her own private wage-slave now that Her Royal ******* Majesty has decided it's a good time to marry.

Whose me-me-me attitude is such that the man she marries has a 50% chance of spending many years sending money for kids she hides from him because she finds it convenient to do so, with no regard for their suffering or his.

Your comment is purely selfish. When 'I' want to marry. Why 'I' want to marry at that age. It is clear you have no thought of the potential husband or what he wants, right? After all, he is only a bit player in your personal future. If he agrees to accept that role.

I say, you go get-em, Tiger. You wait until you are 30 to marry. Just don't blame scummy ole' men if you suddenly discover you can't get a good man (i.e. -- Big Bux) to marry you when you are ready as the very large number of women who are discovering they can't find a husband when they are ready.




P.S. This thread will get moved to the Best of the Happy Bachelors Section once there are enough Happy Bachelor Members who give their two cents worth on this subject matter.[/quote]


Is every woman equipped with the same broken DVD? I have already given up on finding an unskanked woman. I am beyond looking. Now, I use their feeble mind to land them in bed. And its easy. Just use their DOS-like opperating system and treat them well ,20% of the time. The rest of the time, sh*t on their face. Example: Use the bathroom towel that says "her's" on it to wipe your ass after eating a three foot long hot greasy burrito

outcastsuperstar
Legend Bachelor
Posts: 1661
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 4:33 pm

Two Types of Guys

Post by outcastsuperstar » Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:17 am

Basically these women are trying to sell good hardworking men who busted their asses off to get their career going in there 20s while getting financially established in their 30s this package.

27+ year old woman (Sorry you dont get to have my prime years because during my prime you were to boring trying to get your career established. Therefore I slutted these years with men who have no future.)

Pay off any debts I have

If I have a kid(s) from previous men I expect you to pay the bills as they come due

I expect you to marry me

Dont expect sex that often as I already had my fun

Cooking and Cleaning are slavery so you can do this yourself

I have the right to nag you as much as I want, come up with imaginary crises, and I will have honey to do lists ready for you when you come home from a long day of work

I get to spend your hard earned money as I see fit and you will need to ask for my permission if you want to spend any of it.

If were still married after 10+ years and I didnt cash out on you, I expect you be loyal to be when I go through menopause, and when my body is covered with cellulite due to rapid aging

I also get this opt out clause after 5-10 years of marriage, 10 years being the optimum so I could get the best divorce settlement.

In this opt out clause after the 10 year mark

I have the right to make a false domestic violence abuse so you can get booted from the house and I wont even need proof.

Therefore I get the house but you get to make the mortgage payments

I get sole custody of the kids but you get to make the child support payments

I get alimony for life (even if I was banging other guys behind your back)

I get half your retirement benefits since I put up with you through 10 years of marriage

Of course you get to pay my attorney fees as well as yours



Obviously this is a very shitty and insulting deal to any good hard working man who spent many years of his life trying to get his career established.

Obviously as a result a man like self would say HELL FUCKING NO

Yet when men like me reject what these women are offering to us they feel very insulted. Therefore we see articles around the internet written by women way past their prime such as Why Wont Men Commit, Child Man in the Promise Land, Men Cant Handle a Strong Independent Woman, Where Have All The Men Gone

Go figure

edred30

Two Types of Guys

Post by edred30 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 2:32 pm

Here is an e-mail from a 38 year old woman I know. Pay attention to the last sentence:

"Don't get me wrong i do appreciate being single and enjoy it most of the time. Especially considering what is out there, however, there are times when i am sick of being alone, for many reasons. I love my girls but they can't replace a man. I fear being alone in my old age especially since I do not have children to take care of me. Also, men don't get labeled like women do if they are single in their older age, they are a bachelor or a playboy or something like that...we are spinsters and weird and i could go on and on. Oh frigid or ice queens...need i say more? I'm not bashing you...don't take it personally I'm just upset that I meet the crazy ones...I always was the sucker for the "bad" boys but now I can't find a good guy anywhere...."

She sent this in perfect timing for this thread. Heh heh.

freeman
Bachelor
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:44 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by freeman » Wed Nov 12, 2014 8:46 am

Marriage 2.0 is like an elite retirement plan for today's woman.
After she gets some gullible simp to say 'I do', a woman needs to put 10 years into the marriage.
When 10 years are up, she is fully vested, and can cash out via a generous divorce settlement. She can cash out sooner, but doing so would result in reduced benefits (e.g. no lifetime alimony, smaller nest egg to rob from the poor simp, etc).
Beats the heck out of my pension plan. I have to work 25 years and be at least 62.

2wize
Legend Bachelor
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 12:55 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by 2wize » Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:03 am

If I would have gotten married, as I almost did, I would definitely have committed suicide by now.

User avatar
Psychotherapist
Legend Bachelor
Posts: 1408
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:54 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by Psychotherapist » Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:48 pm

2wize wrote:If I would have gotten married, as I almost did, I would definitely have committed suicide by now.
Same here. Except I'd be divorced and broke before jumping off that bridge... :shock:

bjs007
Bachelor
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 2:19 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by bjs007 » Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:43 pm

Blue-pill beta guys generally do not understand women, even so-called "nice" women that try to present themselves in a good light.

See here:

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/03 ... ize-women/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Why do so many betas harbor gauzy delusions about female sexual nature? Why are monogamously inclined traditionalists, manginas and white knighters so quick to sanctify women and paint their misbehavior in rose-colored hues while simultaneously offering unconditional support and shitlapping amen choruses for women when they accuse men of committing a litany of hackneyed misdeeds?

I’m here to provide what I believe is the most parsimonious answer to this riddle:

Beta males are rarely in a position to witness the worst of women.

Put yourself in the typical beta male’s shoes. He spends a goodly chunk of his horniest years — teens to mid 20s — when holes in watermelons look like acceptable vagina substitutes, pining for ethereal hot chicks who don’t pay him a lick of attention as they swoop by him on a cloud of incandescent purity. He sees them only from afar, where his imagination is free to feverishly fill in the gaps with only the most pleasant assumptions about his dreamgirls. When the rare communication does occur, she is as nice and kind as a saint to him. He is too smitten to recognize the hint of pity and condescension laced in her polite chat.

Later, usually college, he fumbles his way through awkward social interactions with plainer janes, the great majority of which end up with him being used for emotional sponging and ball-twisting, torturous friendships. All these girls are exceedingly, superficially kind to him because, after all, why look a gift herb in the mouth? A girl loves beta male attention, as long as it’s platonic, on her terms, extractive, and focused on feeding her ego. Naturally, these girl-friends never talk about their sex lives with the beta, never reveal what really goes on behind closed doors, and never invite the beta to join them on any adventures that really matter to him. Contrary to media popularization, betas rarely hear “This one time, at band camp…” from girls in their social circles. What they often hear instead are requests for help with term papers.

Then, due more to a combination of luck and (ovulation cycle) timing rather than bold effort or charm, the inoffensive beta male might find himself in a fledgling relationship with some semi-cute shut-in nearly as awkward as he and already past her beauty prime. She really likes him and treats him well… more sincerely than the cuter girls who made a sport of cockteasing him at any rate… but like ‘Rat’ Ratner from ‘Fast Times’, he labors for months and months waiting patiently for her to put out. For reasons beyond the beta’s ken, she is an extremely modest girl. He interprets her chasteness as evidence of women’s all-round goodness and saintliness, but of course he is sorta pissed off that she won’t satisfy him without months of “getting to know each other” warming up. When he finally does bust that cherry, after painful years wandering the celibate desert, it’s all he can do to stop himself mentally affixing a halo atop his girlfriend’s head, and pronouncing all women the undistilled essence of goodness.

A few pitiable betas, like those with bitch tits, horizontally stretched navels, and receding chins who wear ‘this is what a feminist looks like’ t-shirts, get trapped in sporadically sexual relationships with manjawed femcunts at grad school, mostly because long-winded bull sessions among their kind occasionally spin up enough libidinous energy to resolve in PBR-fueled late night groping, which is promptly regretted and/or rationalized by one or both parties the next morning, usually the girl.

Eventually, the beta male gets married, and his lack of experience — one to three lifetime “partners” (and I use the term loosely) is the norm — has cultivated in him a strong inability to read women’s signals, which sometimes leads him into blissful ignorance where infidelities can linger for years unnoticed, and “Surprise! I have a divorce paper!” gambits accost him like hammer blows to the head. Mostly, though, he floats through his marriage thinking the best of his wife, and worst of himself should feelings turn sour or the sex dry up. Because this is just what men are supposed to do when a woman is less than happy: take the blame. Women are the weaker sex, after all.

So you see, in the final analysis, it is very likely, by dint of the beta male’s ignorance, inexperience and habituated veneration of women and reflexive indulgence of women’s motives, that his view of women is severely constricted, child-like in its naivete. The beta male is not privy to what Tyler Durden famously called the secret society of women. He was never invited, and he was never apprised of the secret society’s goings-on by any woman in his life. He lives in a pinched world with only a peephole to the wonders beyond, given him not by insight but by stumbling into depravity or by the good grace of a sympathetic alpha male. As far as he knows, women don’t have much sex, and they are very nice and polite most of the time.

The beta male pedestalizes women because one, that’s all women have deigned to show him of their sexual inner world, and two, he cannot bear the contrary thought, affirming and cementing as it does his lackluster place on the sexual totem pole. (He is mired down in the sticky pubes, his vision obscured, while alphas dance joyously at the tip of the glans.)

As for the women, those few who have not experienced the thrill of the alpha male often are nearly as chaste as the beta imagines, because they have never been tempted. All they know are a parade of beta males, whom they lash out at occasionally for unwittingly stifling their truest desires, but who, for the most part, they treat in a nontoxic manner that buttresses heavenly notions about their secretive natures. A woman is ever aware of the precariousness of her reputation, and this goes double in rural outposts of heavy religiosity.

And so the beta male has his crimped worldview confirmed by the asexual, undersexual women in his life. But should he ever step outside his empillowed existence… take that daring step into the gritty, grimy world where the female id roams free across fruited plains of phalluses… screw up the courage of heart to face head-on the previously unimaginable… he will find that a bigger universe has existed all along, enveloping the bubble of his life, surging with unleashed energies just out of his reach like uterine aurorae, and if his soul isn’t killed dead right then from shock, he’ll cross the boundary into this new world — he won’t really have a choice — and never look back.

Nor ever again blindly assume the purest of women’s motivations. The stronger among them do with this newfound knowledge the following: acknowledge, accept, incorporate, delimit. He rules his knowledge, but he does not let it rule him.

Such boundary crossing is rare. The beta and alpha male worlds are almost as separate and distinct now as they have been since the dawn of anonymous urban living. Though that is changing.

If betas knew what alphas experience, it would blow their minds. Completely, utterly. Out from under the judgmental Eye of Proper Society, equipped with the requisite beauty to pay the price of admission, the wild female libido is insatiable, crass, debased. It is willing to surrender to the most vile sexual plunderings, screaming in ecstatic pleasure at every enthusiastically welcome violation. Women of the sweetest daytime dispositions and most innocent countenances — smartly coifed women in demure business suits who expound drily on cost-revenue projections and wait tidily in lines for healthy lunch alternatives — will unleash vaginal hell in the arms of alpha lovers, squirting glorious love over dominant men who swap them like baseball cards, presenting like beasts in heat for throbbing units in dank dive bar restrooms, casually spreading as far as they can go in locked office rooms for illicit lovers, giggling in breathy whispers in their lovers’ ear about the clear and present danger of getting caught, deliberately effusing a fake sorrow for the cheated-on boyfriend back home unawares, bemusing wistfully about a history of letting alpha lovers snort coke off her ass while claiming another headache to evade hubby’s entreaties.

Beta males never see this world. To them, it doesn’t exist. And that’s exactly how women want it.

User avatar
superbad
Sage Bachelor
Posts: 4973
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 12:55 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by superbad » Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:53 pm

Beta males never see this world. To them, it doesn’t exist. And that’s exactly how women want it.
There are men you fuck, and men you marry.
And there is a man you f--k, suck, cook, massage, and desperately try to marry. You work for years; but he eludes you. And a "PUA guru" never sees this world because he's a sheep who puts on a lion's suit. It gets hot after a few hours, and has to be taken off.

bjs007
Bachelor
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 2:19 am

Re: Two Types of Guys

Post by bjs007 » Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:41 pm

outcastsuperstar wrote:Part 1 tune in at the 2 minute 15 second mark, tuning it at the 6 minute mark and watching first 2 minutes and 10 seconds of part 2 and then fast forward to the 7:22 mark is mandatory listening

table width="690" border="0">

table width="690" border="0">

Before Duncan Idaho deleted his original blog, I saved a comment from the comment section.

This comment was from a woman who made a very big confession.

Here it is:

It is a little strange to be saying this, but you guys are far too nice to the women out there. I was always the "conservative" girl in school. I got married early. Let me tell you, most women out there have had LOTS of sex partners. The idea that there are two kinds of men, those you have sex with and those you marry, is the rule.

Basically, a lot of women like to fall in love over and over. This really means having sex with a new guy every few weeks or every few months. The guys who won't commit are perfect for this. These are the guys they fuck.

The guys they marry are the traditional guys who didn't find a traditional woman earlier on. Women tell all their friends to hush up about their past. They find a decent guy and go after him like it is a religious crusade. Once married, sex stops and paying to keep her happy is the rule.

Lots of women would scratch my eyes out for telling this, but it is the RULE 80% of women go by. There are men you fuck, and men you marry.

I see clearly why good guys are angry. My husband and I are happy together, but it is an extra incentive for my husband to make the marriage work when he sees how horrible things are out in the single world.




In a different blog called the Brazilian Bachelor Stacy Jones; your typical American Woman, made this comment.



Irlandes happened to be reading the Brazilian Bachelor blog at the same time and caught Stacey Jones's comment and here is what he had to say.

Um, Stacy, I suspect that perhaps you miss the point here. The issue is not when is a good age to marry. Thirty might indeed be a good age to marry -- only if you can find some stupid schmuck who will marry you at that age.
The issue is most men don't want to marry a woman of any age who has had tens; hundreds; or thousands of lovers. (I have read a number of times that the AVERAGE in the US is eleven.) Who is marrying only after years of travel and frolicking and sexual promiscuity, to have her own private wage-slave now that Her Royal ******* Majesty has decided it's a good time to marry.

Whose me-me-me attitude is such that the man she marries has a 50% chance of spending many years sending money for kids she hides from him because she finds it convenient to do so, with no regard for their suffering or his.

Your comment is purely selfish. When 'I' want to marry. Why 'I' want to marry at that age. It is clear you have no thought of the potential husband or what he wants, right? After all, he is only a bit player in your personal future. If he agrees to accept that role.

I say, you go get-em, Tiger. You wait until you are 30 to marry. Just don't blame scummy ole' men if you suddenly discover you can't get a good man (i.e. -- Big Bux) to marry you when you are ready as the very large number of women who are discovering they can't find a husband when they are ready.

"The guys they marry are the traditional guys who didn't find a traditional woman earlier on. Women tell all their friends to hush up about their past. They find a decent guy and go after him like it is a religious crusade. Once married, sex stops and paying to keep her happy is the rule."

- You mean that women will marry a man that they are not physically/sexually attracted to, but just for his money? That is really pathetic and a shitty way to live.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest